Built on evidence, designed for real life
We've reviewed academic and clinical research on ADHD and Autism to create a research-informed approach to the functional problems and mechanisms that impact daily life — so our tools actually help.
We've reviewed academic and clinical research on ADHD and Autism to create a research-informed approach to the functional problems and mechanisms that impact daily life — so our tools actually help.
We focus on the mechanisms and traits of ADHD and Autism that create real barriers in learning, work and daily life — not labels, but the functional problems people actually face.
Planning, prioritising and sequencing tasks can be significantly harder for ADHD and autistic people. Our research examines how to reduce the executive demand of everyday tools.
Limited working memory capacity affects how information is held, processed and acted on. We study how to offload cognitive demands without adding complexity.
ADHD time perception research shows time is experienced differently — not a discipline problem but a neurological one. We design around how time actually feels.
Sensory sensitivities and overload are common across ADHD and Autism. Our interface research focuses on reducing visual noise, motion and unexpected stimuli.
Rejection sensitivity, frustration intolerance and emotional flooding are well-documented. We research how tools can support regulation rather than trigger dysregulation.
Starting tasks and switching between them can be profoundly difficult. Our research looks at how to lower the activation energy needed to begin and move between activities.
Every design decision at Humble is traceable to a research finding. Here's how our review process translates into product choices.
We conduct structured reviews of peer-reviewed research on ADHD and Autism, focusing on functional impact rather than diagnostic criteria alone.
Academic findings are cross-referenced with clinical practice guidelines and real-world practitioner feedback to ensure practical relevance.
We map specific cognitive and sensory mechanisms to product features — understanding why something is hard before designing how to make it easier.
Research findings become concrete design principles: reduce decisions, support memory externally, respect sensory thresholds, and build predictability.
Every feature is tested with neurodivergent users. Research tells us what should work — co-design tells us what actually does.
We measure whether our research-informed designs improve real outcomes — task completion, reduced frustration, sustained engagement — and iterate accordingly.
We're building our evidence base with experts, not in isolation. If you work in ADHD research, Autism studies, educational psychology or clinical practice, we'd value your input.
See our current research synthesis and methodology. We share openly because we want scrutiny, not just validation.
Challenge our assumptions, point us to research we've missed, or help us interpret findings in clinical context.
Co-author practitioner guides, contribute to published resources, or help design research protocols for future studies.
Your expertise directly informs what we build. Expert advisors get early access and a direct line to the product team.
If you're impacted by ADHD or Autism traits, your perspective shapes everything we build. We're looking for people willing to share their experience — whether that's answering questions, volunteering time for user research, or joining ongoing studies.
We know that the people best placed to inform this work are often the same people most affected by poorly designed systems. We design our research participation to be accessible too.
Whether you're a researcher, clinician, or someone with lived experience of ADHD or Autism — we'd love to hear from you. Tell us how you'd like to contribute.
We'll respond within a few working days with ways you can get involved.